Didn't read all of it, but on what basis are you saying, "most players?" What's your sample size? More likely chance of being poor, or at least not as economically free.
First, you didnt even read the reason i gave there, so i dont need to answer this question. Second, will you say Dota player (which is a free to play game) poor? I dont think so. People didnt play just because its free. If its free and complete shit people wouldn't be playing it at all even with that free tag. Besides, people who play it means they have most likely pc or laptop (since console player base is too small), we can say that they bought it, or have their parent bought it. Also you can't deny the probability of overwatch player, especially kids, asked their parent to buy it can't you? So saying free-to-play game's player as poor is unreasonable don't you think? Also, this debate is kinda useless in a way of how this threat supposed to be. So let leave it here
Lol, k. Sounds an awful lot like you can't more than you don't need to. But yes, let's leave it here. : )
Paladins is a random no name game. The only people that really know the game are OW players, which speaks a lot. It's an inferior version of OW. Yeah, SOME people play Paladins, but not nearly enough to warrant anyone to say that it's popular, or even a game people play. Ask a random on the street and 90% of the time I will say they will have no idea wtf you're talking about.