Honestly speaking, it'll be a hour-long slog as a pawn formation slowly inches forward while the other pieces cover them. Then it gets interesting.
So let's do the math the amount of gold in the world is about 8000 cubic meters equivlente a 171300 tonnes Source:https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-21969100 so asuming a equal distrution across all the population 1.7*10^11 grams * 45.114 $/gram = 7.7*10^12 $ (about 8 trillions) divide it to 7.7 bilions (10^9) and you get about a thousand dollar per person so if you make more than a thousand dollares a month you could by your rightful amount of gold with that considering the size of asteroid that allegedly caused the dinoussaur extiction is about 10 km diameter, assuming that it is a sphere you get a volume of 5.2*10^11 cubic meters https://www.livescience.com/26933-chicxulub-cosmic-impact-dinosaurs.html gold density at 19.3 tonnes per cubic meter you 1*10^13 tonnes, about 460*10^18 (quintillions) So about 59 billions $ per person Now, you just have to survive physical impact and economical implact that this would have
and only one of these is cute. Damn they bringing Martin Luther King out to play Ryan Gosling! *Shivers in anger* As always superman comes off as a dick. Poor garlic bread Ehh I don't really like this one, it seems a bit to forced at the end.
Never really understood all the hate for Superman, or the love for Batman. I like them both, but objectively Batman is both a bigger Gary Stu (Pretty much no one wants to be Superman even if they would want his powers, they don't actually want to be him) and just all around more of a dick. I mean you can say that Superman solves all his problems with his powers, and there is no real issue he can come across, but that isn't really a point. That holds true for Batman too, or Green Lantern, or Spider-man. About the only thing that I would say makes sense or holds any water in that regard is that Superman doesn't have any really amazing foils. He has Lex and Zod and he can have some really good stories with them, but where he really shines isn't the big fights or the grand mysteries but the human dramas, and when he's facing difficult decisions that all his powers mean nothing for, it's in those sorts of stories where Superman's character really lives and thrives. Batman on the other hand is all about the fights, toys and mysteries. Superman is the much harder character to do right.
You know, given the frowning 'basic econ' guy image, I think your are really overthinking/miss the point of this. Pretend this is not gold, but just paper money, everyone have some. Some have more, some have less. Armor truck full of $ crashed and now everyone have money. So they want to buy stuff, expensive stuff. Supply and demand does its magic, and now the cost of stuff rise even higher as the value of the currency decrease with increased of the quantity of said currency. Once the value of currency fall past a certain point, people start using the $ as box padding, as toilet paper, as it is basically worth less to use them that way then buying the actual thing. Spoiler: Sample https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/worl...-s-cheaper-to-use-cash-than-toilet-paper.html Tldr: huge inflation of currency will devalue it. Aka, that gold is now worthless
From my flawed perspective, it's because batman is rich, famous, knows how to fight, and is a lot of ways, the ultimate emo edgelord. Superman on the other hand does his honest best to do good despite the evil and corruption around him. He is damn near all powerful, but doesnt use it to his advantage. And to top it all off, is damn near broke. So who would you rather be, rich, powerful and woo many women in bed and blow their minds, or a loyal guy that is constantly friendzoned and if he did manage to take a gal to bed, if he didnt split her in half would likely literally blow their mind all over the bed...