DotA Mafia Game #27

!vote Lissi

 

DotA Mafia Game

Status: Day 1 - Waiting for votes.

Votes	Target	Voters (Posts in Phase)
2	Isolated0371	@Tilgarial (31), @c.decora (20)
1	Lissi	@Isolated0371 (11)
1	Mr gentleman	@Devils Advocate (29)
1	Devils Advocate	@Lissi (25)
0	No Lynch	---
9	Not Voting	@iampsyx (19), @Clumsy Soul (19), @SylviaViolet (2), @Grey_Angel (6), @Nagashiro (24), @Mr gentleman (0), @Glass Shard (15), @ReaderReader (6), @Lemonfairy (30)

Important
You voted for Lissi. Time Left

 

I may sound stupid but how is self voting being opportunistic?

 

Saying very early on, when barely anything happened, that you're a PR and then immediately leaving thread.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying inactivity is sus, but it feels like you arranged that to be your last post, and that feels weird.
And weird is sus

 

Also, about this. If I gave you three bullets, and you had to flip 3 people in the game, who would you flip? Preferably explain why as well

 

I think they meant, how are you feeling about the games, liking them or not?

Well, yeah if mafia takes you seriously.

Hmmmmmmmmmmm this seems sus. As I read your *Thank you Psyx* I actually thought of what you and Psyx being mafia buddy with how Psyx read your claim as you being mischeivous and you on your last quote you threw that thought too of you and Psyx being mafia together. So, that is making me think either you and Psyx are mafia buddy or you are tryna make it seem like that.

 

Then you guys got me... .in my sleep-deprived exhaustion addled mind

or maybe this is a double bluff


or maybe...

GO TO SLEEP!!! Devils Avocado one vote will not change the world!!!

 

Somebody else self voted, and Lissi hopped on them. iirc it was Lissi saying it felt off/wolfy and it was a way to avoid discussion with people

 

Nah, the inactivity is a fair point. I am well within the bottom % of the posters.

Just wondering what you thought I was trying to achieve by claiming a PR

 

Can you give me more than "that one thing feels opportunistic"?
Because iirc that slot is doing chaotic stuff, and I absolutely understand where sussing that comes from, so saying that's opportunistic and wanting that to be the lynch without anything else is a bit... meh, yanno?

 

It is waste to put your vote on an inactive tho.

No one? Well not untill you give a valid reason to join a wagon lead by you.

 

They’re a change from my main site, but that’s not a bad thing. I would agree it’s definitely a more chill vibe here, and you could probably ask zone to see if my meta reflects that

Would they, though?

Would you say I’m… 70 - 30 mafia? as in, 70% chance of being mafia?

 

It specifically wasn't the inactivity itself, though. For me anyways.
It's the... progression of it all? The inactivity is a part of that yes, and I understand rl doesn't always play nice, but this particular one feels pre arranged.
So you're definitely planning something, in hindsight, but what you're planning is absolutely WIFOM

 

When I read it myself, I thought of it as normal. I didn’t see it as something particularly out of place because that’s what you and I had done just at day start with votes, which could encourage also playing around with the bot.
What I can see S!Lissi doing here is voting a target that can be a D1 lynch rather quickly — and like you said, playstyle being chaotic can play right into that. And if people join because of other reasoning (chaotic playstyle as opposed to Lissi’s reasoning) then it’s essentially a free kill and Lissi’s hands are clean.

 

I liked that you did some reads. I don't like this

 

Atleast they would consider or give it a thought, depending on the players who are mafia. Just as we try to look at every stuff properly to try to find mafia members, they would try to get rid of PR first.

With how the things have been so far, yeah I think your chances of being mafia might be more for me, as you throwing sus on yourself more instead of clearing them properly and confusing others.

 

Fair enough. I get what you mean
(there was one time on my main forum I saw a chain of posts and thought there was a scum in 3 people, but it turns out they all were town! All I could point to was how fake the posts felt and how it progressed)

 

double post edit^
* - not that them all being town is relevant

 

I can get behind that

 

I checked their posts, it seemed like they were active even after dropping the vote so it being a way to avoid discussion seems unlikely to me.