Discussion Rocket engine

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by lychee, Apr 15, 2019.

  1. lychee

    lychee [- slightly morbid fruit -] ❀[ 恋爱? ]❀

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2017
    Messages:
    2,156
    Likes Received:
    5,407
    Reading List:
    Link
    This topic has been on my mind for some time (lychee likes imagining game design, okay?), so maybe somebody can help me.

    In this fictional setting, we have:
    1. A rocket engine that has an exhaust velocity close to the speed of light
    2. A fuel source with incredibly high energy density that can be converted by the engine at close to 100% efficiency

    I’d like to calculate the following:

    How much delta-v can you get from a rocket engine like this?

    How high does the fuel energy density need to be to power this engine?

    ——————————

    Extra:

    The way I have this conceptualized is that the rocket engine is a particle accelerator that ejects mass (lets use hydrogen for simplicity) at velocity v where v is close to the speed of light.

    I’m assuming energy is converted perfectly so the energy required to accelerate mass is naively related to the kinetic energy of the ejected material (albeit my understanding of relativistic physics is poor).

    Let F be the fuel source with mass m that provides the energy for this engine.

    Let P be the propellant with mass p that is ejected by the rocket engine.

    Curious about what kind of mystical fuel source this engine would require, and whether this type of engine would be sufficient to drive large spaceships that you see in science fiction.
     
  2. Deleted member 155674

    Deleted member 155674 Guest

    Reading List:
    Link
    Does your rocket reach the speed of light instantly or does it reach it gradually?
     
  3. prongsjiisan

    prongsjiisan Apostle of Violence

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2015
    Messages:
    3,071
    Likes Received:
    4,366
    Reading List:
    Link
    Alt + F12 open the cheat tab check infinite fuel and infinite electricity.

    Your ship is basically has infinite deltaV. In theory regular engine could go into near speed of light.
     
  4. naghi32

    naghi32 The Loner

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2016
    Messages:
    837
    Likes Received:
    789
    Reading List:
    Link
    I recommend reading :
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter_rocket

    While we currently are unable to generate anti-matter in large quantities ( IE : Only at the level of single atoms ) it should give you an good ideea.

    In theory if you can find matter/antimatter scattered here & there, then you get a Δv close to infinity, but never getting to c, but anyway at those speeds, you`d be torn to shreds by crashing into single atoms wandering the universe ... and i`d say that is a bigger problem.

    For a simple conversion, 1gram of given matter is equal to ~ 24965421.6388888881 KWh ( Yes that is 24 Trillion Watts / hour )
    1 gram of matter , e=mc2 = 8.98755179E+13 Joules.
    For comparison the Saturn V rocket had at launch almost 35100000 joules/m ( puny compared to the above ) now just replace values and you get a DeltaV of however much you want ^_^
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2019
  5. lychee

    lychee [- slightly morbid fruit -] ❀[ 恋爱? ]❀

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2017
    Messages:
    2,156
    Likes Received:
    5,407
    Reading List:
    Link
    The rocket doesn't reach the speed of light instantly.

    The prompt specifically says that the exhaust velocity of the engine (a linear accelerator) gets close to speed of light, which doesn't mean that the rocket itself will fly at the speed of light.

    From wikipedia:

    [​IMG]

    Here we see a particle (with mass dm) ejected from the rocket at at velocity ve (which is some very high speed).

    However, even if ve is ejected at close to the speed of light, dv (the change in velocity of the rocket) isn't necessarily so fast depending on the mass of the rocket.

    ------------------------------------------------

    I did some more calculations regarding the amount of mass a fantasy spaceship would want to dedicate towards propellant fuel.

    A Yamato-class battleship weighs 70,000-72,000 long tons (71123284-73155377 kg) and has a 6,300 tons fuel oil (5715264 kg) with a final ratio of ~0.08.

    A 2012 toyota camry has a ratio of around 0.05.

    For arguments sake, let's say that the typical fantasy imagining of a space vessel (which in Japan was inspired by the naval vessels) carry around 10% of their mass as fuel.

    Then to calculate delta-v (with an optimistic assumption that 10% of mass is rocket propellant):

    [​IMG]

    delta-v = ~31,600 km/s = (0.1c)

    Which is a very generous amount (in terms of travel inside the solar system).

    ---------------------------------------------------

    So the followup question to this is the amount of energy required to power an engine like this.

    Naively, kinetic energy is given 0.5mv^2 but this doesn't work in relativistic settings, in which case the modified equation is actually:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    It actually takes an infinite amount of energy to accelerate something to the speed of light, so it's necessary to pick a practical limit at some fraction of the speed of light.

    So let's pick 0.8c as an arbitrary exhaust velocity.

    To use Star Wars as our fantasy index case, an Imperial Star Destroyer weighs around 40 million tons (36,287,389,600 kg). 10% of which (propellant) is 3,628,738,960 kg. To accelerate this propellant to 0.8c, the kinetic energy associated is 217423195505603583778883627 J.

    This can be thrown into E=mc2 to roughly estimate the amount of mass associated with this energy which is 2,415,813,283.4 kg (2.6 million tons).

    This comes out to another 6.5% of mass fuel for energy too.

    -----------------------------

    Summary:

    I think for space ships it's reasonable to set an exhaust velocity at 0.8c.

    Of the total mass, take 10% as fuel for propellant and another 10% for engine energy.

    This is all ideal case though.
     
    Deleted member 155674 likes this.
  6. Deleted member 155674

    Deleted member 155674 Guest

    Reading List:
    Link
    Actually, what I am about to say might sound weird and strange and literally crazy if not stupid :facepalm: but since you are imagining a fictional setting for a game :blobunsure:, why don't you change (make few hypotheses on a fictional basis :blobsweat_2:, since this is just a fictional setting perhaps thinking 'outside of the box' could help a bit for better results :blobunsure:) a few things in this rocket? (although, I think that there are real studies assuming different cases like a disc shaped spaceship and such and studies about an inexhaustible power source and special kinds of fuel, etc..., but some remain as theories as current techological 'advancement' aren't enough and some were dropped because of being scientifically impossible(insane and maybe idiotic?), and some because they are financially inadequate and remain in the emulations and simulations :hmm:), however, for a game I think theory is possible to make.
    For example, a spherical shape like the Death star for a spaceship, or having a power source like the matrix of leadership(transformers), other possiblities could include adding another pushing(firing, propelling force to the launched ship as if they were some sort of bullet and the launchpad as the gun, helping the rocket as a catapult I guess :blobconfused:), etc...
    Crazy right :blobsweat::blobsweat:
     
  7. userunfriendly

    userunfriendly A Wild Userunfriendly Appears!

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2017
    Messages:
    11,643
    Likes Received:
    9,869
    Reading List:
    Link
    Bussard interstellar ramjet.:blobhero:
     
  8. rwnrmdn

    rwnrmdn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2017
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    45
    Reading List:
    Link
    Im on a click bait of rocket...now im dizzy and want to throw up...i need my pizza...