I think in the real world we're dealing with, you know, sexual assaults happening in dorm rooms while twits online go "But really, what about the issues men face, because 1 accusation in 20 might be false?" Hikers nearly dying from hypothermia is an artificial and overelaborate edge case we don't really have to worry about here. When people have to do stuff for emergency medical reasons, people will do so, acting like grownups.
While it is estimated that only 2%-10% of investigated rapes are deemed to be false, the truth is that almost any claim could be false or true or misunderstood as being rape (maybe it was rough consensual sex).
Let me get this straight if someone innocent is accused of rape they should just take it and not be angry and not prove that their accuser is lying and try to defend themselves? Is that what you're saying because that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard
I'm blaming the era we live now rather than the victim. Because nowaday, it's hard to determine who's the real victim of sexual harassment even though technology is progressing. People can just talk about it in socmed and... Boom! Social outcast Don't know how many men got false accusation and had their live ruined because of it... I remember that one meme in 9gag about the rapist killer hercules. That later after the murder, the victim said she didn't get raped Dunno if this is true or false
No, you didn't get that straight. I said, firstly, that organized hate groups cherrypick and vastly overreport false accusations in order to feed a sense of male victimhood. This helps them recruit the unpolarized, and it helps them feel good about themselves when they swarm some female journalist or politicians twitter feed with trolling and death threats. Because it's about contempt for the 'wrong kind of woman'. The recruiting works. Right now, right here, you're a lot more keyed up about the (rare) possibility of false accusations and the 'wrong kind of woman', then you are about the (much more frequent) possibility of sexual harrassment or sexual assault. You're completely not keyed up about the argument earlier that "if a woman dresses in a provocative manner, it's completely natural for her to be harassed and sexually assaulted, it's her fault, really." And you're doing this in a thread dedicated to the false thesis "sexual harassment is over-reported but is much less common these days".
Actually, I’ve heard a lot about how rapists actually tend to choose women who aren’t scantily clad to rape. That a lot of women who’ve been raped are confused, because they were dressed in baggy clothes, etc.
That's right! That's why she blackmailed Ai-chan with going on a vacation together with her on her birthday. Ai-chan told her to talk to her mom first, but she said her mom is too busy to celebrate her birthday with her. Ai-chan didn't mean we should invite her mom together, but more like how she should ask permission first. Ai-chan also talked about it with Ai-chan's dude and dudette. Ai-chan's dude didn't really mind. Ai-chan's dudette just laughed and told Ai-chan to seduce the little girl so hard she'd agree to a threesome with Ai-chan's dudette. Waiwai is such a horny girl.
Yeah sign.. you see a woman drowning with blue hair and a tattoo i am a strong and independent woman. With no one else on a pool to help just run and call for help but be prepared to be sued for her death. When rescuing someone you're mind is focus on what you are about to do not thinking about the possibilities of that person suing you. If a person drowns in a pool with a lifeguard and a lifeguard did nothing but call for help and didn't move to do it himself expect for the worse. A lifeguard can be held liable. https://www.psblaw.com/2018/09/26/when-can-lifeguard-be-held-liable-for-pool-drowning/ Now where does that strong and independent woman case enter? Did that woman signed a waiver that state no one will be held liable if she drown in a pool with a male lifeguard? Also are there any clear and consistent indicators for identifying women who refuse help from male lifeguard? Is it a part of their training and qualification? Also if a woman just want her hair blue but wish to be saved by anyone if her life is in danger should we just let her die to be just on the safe side? Refusing rescue and suing your rescuer with sexual harassment should be illegal and your preference shouldn't matter except when you give up your right to be rescue entirely.. Edit: Gender preference should be ignored if life need rescue. With the LGBTIQA+ adding new letter and symbol to their name and adding more gender should we revise every law and rule every time something is added? Should a pool hire more lifeguard for every gender based on LGBTIQA+ and add more if LGBTIQA+ decide that we need more gender?