Stupid Science Question (Please answer ASAP)

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by Chilli_Chiia, Jun 10, 2020.

Tags:
  1. Chilli_Chiia

    Chilli_Chiia Trying to survive my courses

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2017
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    581
    Reading List:
    Link
    Is it true the slower the velocity, the slower the object moves?
     
  2. TXHY

    TXHY Normal Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2020
    Messages:
    1,124
    Likes Received:
    1,227
    Reading List:
    Link
    Hmm it should be true....
    Maybe
     
  3. Lazy Bookworm

    Lazy Bookworm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2017
    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    504
    Reading List:
    Link
    As I remember, velocity is speed over time. So, yes.
     
  4. Ha-Ha

    Ha-Ha A chance to love you, protect you, Shen Anxin.

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2018
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    201
    Reading List:
    Link
    Velocity is basically speed but in a particular direction, so the object should be slow.
     
  5. KurouDaijuji

    KurouDaijuji Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2016
    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    369
    Reading List:
    Link
    Mostly.

    Thinks get funky when velocity approaches the speed of light...
     
  6. Snowbun

    Snowbun

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    10,184
    Reading List:
    Link
    ...is this a homework thread? :blobpeek:
     
  7. Kadmos1

    Kadmos1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2017
    Messages:
    2,982
    Likes Received:
    1,538
    Reading List:
    Link
    Are you 1 of my ex-teachers?
     
    felidormit likes this.
  8. Chilli_Chiia

    Chilli_Chiia Trying to survive my courses

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2017
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    581
    Reading List:
    Link
    haha no.
     
  9. Chilli_Chiia

    Chilli_Chiia Trying to survive my courses

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2017
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    581
    Reading List:
    Link
    Nope, an assessment question that my friend had. We had different report questions.
     
  10. AMissingLinguist

    AMissingLinguist [Not Here][Blank Sect][Nuffian #N]

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Messages:
    2,297
    Likes Received:
    6,383
    Reading List:
    Link
    Speed is relative to wherever the reference point is. If the reference point was an observer and moves at 50 km/s, and the object as a sign is moving at 0 m/s, then from the perspective of the observer, the sign is moving at 50 km/s. The object has no velocity, but moves very fast past the observer.

    The above answer is meant to make you sound smarter, and does not actually answer the question from your teacher or friend.
     
    asriu likes this.
  11. mystic.alix

    mystic.alix Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2020
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    4
    Reading List:
    Link
    Wow, this just reminded me how much I remember from my physics class. But, anywho, velocity takes into account (vector) where as speed does not (scalar). They're used interchangeably in common speech. So, to answer your question, I think: yes.
     
    AMissingLinguist likes this.
  12. asriu

    asriu fu~ fu~ fu~

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2016
    Messages:
    18,554
    Likes Received:
    18,154
    Reading List:
    Link
    hmm not really remember cuz long time ago but da speed move like curve when reach speed light, gah anomaly~
     
  13. KurouDaijuji

    KurouDaijuji Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2016
    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    369
    Reading List:
    Link
    Some of the complications arise from the fact that as velocity approaches c, mass increases, which also increases local gravity, which slows down local time (this has actually been demonstrated using atomic clocks in cars on a highway in the US in 90s IIRC) which means velocity is arguably lower (& as mass increases the volume where gravity increases gets larger, as does the dilation of time).

    So I simplified (because I don't really understand all of it myself) to "funky".
     
    asriu likes this.