Nice try but my question was a legit one. Unlike yours, which is something completely absurd to think about. Morals are what make human achieve what they have achieved.
Says the guy that knows nothing about psychology and space travel.
Read something about why we can't do certain experiments in those fields, then argue.
Know nothing? Lol, just because we can't do experiment on human doesn't mean you can't go to space. There has been various advancement made by humans in this field. Plus, doing experiment on human does more harm than good, it has been proven times to times in history. It will slow down the progress instead. In case you don't know, crossbreed between human and animal ban has been lifted.
You can't do an experiment on a human without him knowing what exactly are you researching. This debilitates psychology as that knowledge affects results of every experiment you make. As for space, there are nowadays some, who threw notions of safety and returning home away, so there is a hope in that field, but still, we could be on Mars already if we did it since the beginning.
Yeah, the test subject must know what are they subjected to, however when there negative symptoms shown, it should be stopped immediately like the recent research on men. Secondly, your claim about space should be supported by evidence rather than assumption. Scientists have been sending animals till this day.
Animals are not humans.
They work differently and we don't need them up there.
What I meant by space exploration was things like visiting Mars.
You don't send chimp there.
Also, you need to tell your subjects exactly what are you trying to find, not what will they be subjected to. If only that was true, there would not be a problem. Telling them the purpose of study is what creates the problem.
You see, the gravitational force, the surface of the planet and the atmosphere are different from Earth and if an animal can't survive. So is human so what's the point sending someone to their pointless death? Until they can create a suit that lets human to actually adapt so that they can conduct experiment on Mars, they'll be sending robots because they'll do better job.
No animals were ever sent outside Earths orbit.
We know very well how harsh conditions out there are and we can make humans survive there. It's just costly. Much more so if you want to return humans back. Hence morals keeping us back. Without return trip, we could send humans there much earlier.
Nope, sending someone to their death will never contribute to anything. You're stupid for saying that because what are you saying is basically "do the same thing again and again, it'll work somehow". Humans' lives aren't your fucking toy. Wasting someone life to study a fraction of infinite is simply dumb because not doing so will eventually lead to the same.
I think you don't understand something. The approach they're making is not against any moral. Sending people to Mars isn't immoral and staying there isn't immoral too. Your entire status is bullshit. You relate terraform with moral, what is wrong with you?
Comments on Profile Post by platys51