Yeah, there aren't too many studies compared to other fields, because of the political agenda which you already said. But ALL studies which exist prove my point beyond the doubt and there is no real study to deny it. So until we have study to deny my claims - what I say is the position of science. Eh, everything I said is about the fact that gender and racial differences ARE real and there are countless studies about this topic. And that those differences have nothing to do with "discrimination" or "racism" or "sexism" and anyone has full right to mention them. Your point, on the other hand, is still unclear. Do you deny the existence of racial and gender differences? It would be an absurd thing to do. Everything you said is "oh, but there aren't enough credible studies and those that exist aren't approved by some organization which decides what studies are right and wrong". But to disapprove of any of my points you should link the studies which DENY any differences in said topics. Or, if we talk about homosexuality, studies that deny ANY correlation to biology and sexual orientation. You never linked ANY study to prove your point, because ALL studies which exist in the whole world are those that prove my point in every topic we talked about. Eh, very interesting claim and it is also close to the truth. But there is also the fact that human female is closer to chimpanzee female than human male is to chimpanzee female. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/14/chimp_genome_y_chromosome_gumble/ But you do. It is how science works. If we know how the gravitation works on the Earth we can assume that it works the same way around the whole world and we can calculate things billions of light-years away from us. We even can calculate how things happen inside the black holes. And we can PREDICT existence of things we never ever measured. And, so far, it was successful more than once. It is strange that you can't understand the basics of science even after all the education you did for your profession. You don't need to measure each person to learn about sexual or racial differences, as long as the sample is random enough and big enough. Lol, there is no reason to do that, what is really important is the ability of a certain person which can be tested personally. On the contrary, in the modern western world, there are gender quotas and racial quotas. It means that as long as this quota wasn't met then you should accept women or people of certain races or even orientations even if they have an inferior resume and test results. The same way as women doesn't compete in Olympics against men, because if they did, then there would be only men (in 90% cases) who compete with each other. Now society tries to create similar environment in other fields. https://www.theguardian.com/austral...-entry-score-adjustment-for-female-applicants This is the real sexism of the modern world. Yeah, this difference would be too small to be significant. But in any of the studies I linked, the difference IS significantly big.