Is it masochism to say that i like this kinda manga, where the girls is straight forward,a bit alpha-ish and not the annoying shoujou Shy girl where they completely blush and daydream, acting like a lovestruck fool. Oh yeah recommend me some that is like this
Nah - it's damn unusual to have a straightforward MC / FL in a Japanese manga, but still very refreshing. : ) It's when she trips into pure sadistic yandere mode - and you like it - that you need to start worrying.
Well thats worrying, Since her sadistic yandere mode was my favorite in that , though i probably half-half since i hate dense japanese mc/beta mc as well, i just enjoy the uniqueness of the story since almost all manga have this blushing shy girl.
Being straightforward and a bit%h are two different things. Ya, I can get into a girl that straight up say what she wants to say without any shame nor be shy about it. Even being upfront with her actions, as long as it isn't her being selfish and forcing her thoughts and whatnot onto others. So, of course, I understand the reason why it is "unique" to you. But this girl clearly enjoys the fact the mc is so cowardly and pathetic, it's pure sadism on her part. Which is no surprise considering the mangaka is a hentai author. Anyway, people have their own opinions on people and inferences on other people's personalities and actions. Down the road, I can see her mellowing out and not being such a bi%ch to the guy, or people in general but as of right now, it's purely sadistic and masochistic in nature. So personally I think that to like this kind of manga it is masochistic if you can enjoy it from the male's perspective, and sadistic from hers.
Black Lagoon It's full of women (and guns)- but no romance Is Yuno from Mirai Nikki too much of the "shy 'n blushing" type? Liked her yandere mode
I read it since people said it was similar to Karakai Jouzu no Takagi-san. It's... okay? Some of the scenes seems to be straight out bullying rather than the teasing in karakai jouzu. Not to my liking but there's nothing inherently wrong with it. To each his own right?