Hi guys! I thought of writing this while walking on my terrace for fresh air and blah blah
Aaandd earlier today I made these sketches.
Based on principles of shape language and stuff, based on some art videos I watched before.
Some of the words were "Oh the most distinct and successful/memorable character designs have the right shape language and blah blah, they can be told who they are from the silhouette itself".
Welp, many people may argue that "Artstyle! Irl it doesn't depend on what a person looks like! Stereotypes!" Welp, subconsciously even anime artists use these stuff (or even people irl use these stereotypes).
What do I feel about it is again conflicting. I have always been against pure stereotypes, like "more round = more friendly", "more athletic/hourglass shaped = more confident" BUT we do apply the logic subconsciously.
In most cases, in anime, it's mostly through eyes and hair shape. If the character has curly hair, we consider her to be friendly and nice, a bit dumb, triangular hair (?) and eyes: more proud and confident and strong, square shaped eyes/hair : smart, cool, cold sometimes, quiet.
Soooo imo as an artist it IS important to be able to convey a message about the character just with the design as long as people don't apply it irl. But ironically these stereotypes are formed because of what we see around us irl. Not the other way. We consider triangular jagged, pointy stuff in nature to be intimidating and strong, round things like the sun and moon and rounded clouds and fluffy rounded cotton to be warm and soft, and square shaped buildings and stuff to be related to "perfection, smart, organised" and so on. But to judge people on the basis of "shape language" is rude and dumb imo. Ofc certain shapes help in balancing out the shape of the body, like, for a round face, round glasses don't look that good, but then again. "aesthetics" is different and judging people by shapes is different.
Which means, I see little connection between shapes and stereotypes in art with reality, meaning, I am not against it. Lol.
Also I realised I really like the "round" girl. Might design an oc like that. It's rare for me to use that shape, and I think I should try lol. Especially since I have a body type similar to her.
Anyways it's really just a opinion piece, not a philosophy or anything. I am not saying anyone has to agree, but. Yeah. To sum it up
* No matter what our artstyle we subconsciously end up using principles of shape theory because of what's already being portrayed around us and our natural thought process too.
* Not applying them, is ok, is good too. No need to feel bad about your art style if someone calls it "too realistic/ too exaggerated" I am sure many won't most of the time. (Personally is into realism than cartoony exaggeration, so not a fan of exaggeration tip)
* what we draw does reflect our tastes and what influenced us, but we don't need to dwell on it. Don't go harassing artists for not drawing what YOU think they should have because most of the time they mean no harm, they only care about aesthetics (which ends up harming a lot of people sometimes but it's a different story if it does harm a lot of people).
Shapes, body types, stereotypes and artstyle
Author
Nyann
Nyartist, Female
- Messages:
- 2,713
- Likes:
- 28,988
- Points:
- 448
- Blog Posts:
- 146