There's no particular reason for asking. Judge yourself by your own moral standards. Therefore: Good = "I usually feel good about myself" Evil = "I usually feel like an awful person" Lawful = "I usually follow the rules. The ones that matter, at least." Chaotic = "I threw out the rulebook a long time ago." Oh, and maybe you can talk about your alignment. Tell a story that shows "the real you". But feel free to make your story more interesting. For instance, "I return my library books on time" could become "This one time I had one day left to return my library book, but Godzilla was about to destroy the library, so I hurried up and asked him nicely not to knock any more buildings down. Long story short, it turns out he loves BL too, and now we're best friends!"
When I black out from drinking all the bad things in my mind I want to do happens eg clothes line people on bikes. Slap a hot coffee on someone's face. Bite someone's jugular when outnumbered in a fight. Yeah actually I might be chaotic not lawful lol
One thing ive learned One should not be constained by labels. Take lawful as an example. You are bound by the lawmakers. Say a company lobbies the government to uphold a law going against your will, you should be able to resist. My friend put it this way, too much of anything is bad. If you are really evil, thats bad, but so is being too good. Coz people would take advantage of you.
I follow the rules just because, but i dont particulary love the good deads i prefer to see other suffer for theyr mistake and prefere the chaos over the good
Ah the DND chart, so unrealistic. I'm human, that means I at times encompass all those definitions, sometimes I'm good, at other times neutral, and sometimes evil. Not to mention that there are many other ways to be than just those 9, not to mention that the definitions themselves don't really make too much sense anyway.
you know, everyone has a bit of this "psychotic" thoughts at some point, or have a really really "nice" thought, and they still either considered them decent or not good, those that fully considered themselves as good or evil people are hypocrites
I see myself as lawful neutral if I were to classify myself by the D&D system I don't care much if you're actions result in what is considered good or evil when you interact with me for the most part. I prefer good of course, but it is more important to me that a person follows a set of their own principles and accept the consequences for their actions as a result. I tend to look down on people who don't have a sense of integrity or some kind of moral backbone. But I don't mind if I don't see eye to eye with them.
Sometimes, being good means doing something beyond the law. (Robin hood?) But being lawful doesn't get you arrested no matter how bad you are if you're good at finding loopholes in the laws. (Mafias/yakuzas/underground societies) Not a bad poll.
hmmm. . . . i used to make multiple saves just to check my characters path using those different types of will. . . and that game is Baldur's Gate. . . fun times. . .
Bring on the chaos, give me apocalypse. All our current lives' trivialities will lose meaning and people's true nature will reveal itself.
Yeah, there are some silly parts to the DnD alignment system. It's actually pretty useful as a guide IMO as long as characters aren't forced to act according to their alignment. Most people do have moral patterns, being usually nice (good) or usually selfish (evil), usually abiding by the rules (lawful) or usually seeing how far they can bend the rules without getting punished (chaotic), or acting according to the situation and mood. It becomes a problem in DnD because people disagree on what alignments mean, or the DM gives a paladin a "break the law or support evil" ultimatum because paladins are silly. It shouldn't be a problem here because I tweaked the definitions and people can choose how they feel, but what kind of morality/alignments do you like? I think I can still add more choices if I see good ones.
Ai-chan is chaotic good. Ai-chan will help anyone who gives Ai-chan beautiful girls and cute traps to devour. Ai-chan doesn't care if Ai-chan ends up helping an evil tyrant set on world domination. Give me the girls (and traps) and the world is yours. Yum!
I remember the paladin ultimatum, I had a DM pull that on me, he didn't drop the issue until I had to point out, that my god was totally fine with my actions as outlined in the campaign guide, glory to that god who wanted his paladins to act as Judge Dredd.