The question is easy. Say you have someone who loves you madly, and this someone is willingly requesting to have children with you. This someone's character is ideal to your standards and sexually appealing to you as well. Are you willing to become the father or mother and of his or her children... even when those children of yours will inevitably infest the planet with their numbers as they enter puberty? Plague and plunder all human settlements. Poison and destroy all natural resources. Death to all by promiscuity and savagery. Spoiler: Open spoiler after deciding an option in poll. Contraception is useless. Sterilization is useless. You will inevitably impregnate the person or be impregnated by the person once you accept creating those newborns.
Well it's simple, you just have to guide your progeny into destroying the world while also rebuilding it akin to being a catalyst of change.
I would procreate, why not? Chances are that when they fuck the world I will be already dead. I mean, it takes nine months for a child to be born, and I am fairly it would take dozens, hundreds of those little devils to end the world
Seeing as if i'm going to copulate this person. The only outcome i could see is a crazy generation of kids that would instead rebuild the world in an unexpected way. And thats if i could get laid tho.
Far worse. The point is, having children is equivalent to ending the world within an era. The person wants children. No children, no sex in any positions or techniques.
Huh? I don't get your question. The person can be either he or she, based on your sexual orientation. Of course, if you're both male, it would be impossible to impregnate one another, similarly if you're both female. The ideal necessarily does not mean perfect or all checks; rather it's a person of character and appeal you find most attractive, and worth living beside him or her in your entire life.
Then that person would not be an ideal couple anymore. If that person didn't want anal then for someone that's a turn off for them. Congratulations, a paradox just saved the world!
Hell no, nya. I don't really like kids save for a chosen few, nya. Moreover, I'm ace, nya. I'd rather run away than face the challenge of copulation, nya.
Were you watching this movie when you thought up this post? Idiocracy: In 2005, average in every way private Joe Bowers (Luke Wilson) is selected to take part in a secret military experiment to put him in hibernation for a year along with a woman named Rita (Maya Rudolph). The slumbering duo is forgotten when the base they are stored on is closed down and are left in stasis until 2505. When they finally wake up, they discover the average intelligence of humans has decreased so much that Joe is now the smartest man in the world.
I think you are surely mistaken, because I did not say they are an ideal couple. I simply said their character is ideal but ideal may not necessarily mean all your desires or whims be fulfilled easily. Paradox? I am paradoxical in nature. True to my mentality, every thing I do is contradictory in all shape and form. A paradox can not save the world, only you can by rejecting the person's request.