@brasca123 - No Lynch @shad12ow - No Lynch @Zone Q11 @LittleFox21 - No Lynch @seriouslynope - No Lynch @ForumObserver - No Lynch @Chocol8 @iampsyx @Justderpin - Lynch shad12ow @LifeFrog @Nurman @Omnifarious - No Lynch No Lynch: 6 Lynch shad12ow: 1
Btw the stats are 6 radiants, 3 dires and 2 neutrals.. So not taking into account the one modifier.. It should be 6:5 a very close chance in case we do a lynch.. As I already said I like lynch on first day as it gives more info than no lynch
Oh nevermind we are 12... so there are 3 neutrals >.>.. Then 6:6 then 50% chance of hitting a non radiant... Wow this is the highest chance we had XD
I would like to wait for the others response first about this.. cause currently mine is driven by previous games results lol.. so not really good.. that would be @seriouslynope hahaha
Oh yeah since we have 3 neutrals.. be careful of batrider (recently revealed in OOC).. @A5G_Reaper will batrider skills notify the player? like you been oiled.. and can he burn people any number of times? like night 1 oil then burn.. night 2 oil then burn.. or can just decide once?
Found it.. So he can't kill on the first night at least but is dangerous in the long run XD.. and base on how are GM thinks, I feel a batrider is there when we have 3 neutral units
Lynch @shad12ow My reasoning is pretty simple for this, we have 6 radiant and 6 non-radiant on this game, that means that, just as Choco-kun said, we have a 50% chance of hitting a non-radiant with a lynch. Considering that what we currently know of neutral characters (SK and Batrider), neutrals in general benefit from no lynch on day phase, as they can kill people night phase, similarly speaking, dires also benefit from it as they get a free kill. So, I'm considering anyone that voted for No Lynch as someone suspicious for this game. As to why Shadow? He already had a vote, more chances of the lynching actually happening.
After that's said im going to go no lynch because i have lynched someone on the first and it didnt end well (sorry shadow)
Hmm...no lynch for now. I won't base my vote on meta reasons, doing so is either someone being petty or using that reason as a smoke screen for their scummy actions. Will wait for further development but I will vote based on my gut feeling if we reach near the end of the day if I still see no one to reasonably vote for.
*never checks first post except for checking what do each role do.* Since you're at it Rea-chan... Could you put the revealed roles on the first post? *sighs* Well, there really isn't any real reason to keep the importance of lynching someone on first day now... Change my vote to No Lynch.
Yes, but remember, if we do have an arsonist in this game then combined with Warlock, then at the 2nd, 3rd or 4th day lots of people will die. LOTS. I will never trust RNG, even with a 50:50 chance. No lynch and end the day early.
What is Arsonist? I wasn't going to give much trust to RNG either, but I thought that considering that 6 of the 11 other people were dangerous, I thought it was well worth it to try and lynch someone that I found to be suspicious. With some luck this would bring up slip ups from someone else that would make me consider them dire. Would be better than to simply wait until night phase in which we could have 4 people killed due to 3 neutrals and dire... This is all made useless as Rea-chan said that we have no Neutrals on this game though.